This is what economists mean when they say "win-win" situation?
At least he called him "an economist" (p. 133)
There is nothing I can possibly add to Tim Lambert's destruction of John Lott, who insists we use his data even though the dog (or something) ate his homework.
But I hasten to note that Freakonomics called Lott "an economist," while Levitt Paul Krugman was a "New York Times columnist and devout critic of George W. Bush (p. 91)." Maybe Levitt can blame it all on his co-author?
(Updated with page references and the full Krugman description)
There is nothing I can possibly add to Tim Lambert's destruction of John Lott, who insists we use his data even though the dog (or something) ate his homework.
But I hasten to note that Freakonomics called Lott "an economist," while Levitt Paul Krugman was a "New York Times columnist and devout critic of George W. Bush (p. 91)." Maybe Levitt can blame it all on his co-author?
(Updated with page references and the full Krugman description)
posted by Ken Houghton at 21:14
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home